Who this is for
This article is for leaders working in project-based organisations—heavy engineering firms, industrial services, infrastructure programs, and other execution-driven businesses—where sales and marketing are expected to work together, but often don’t.
It is written from first-hand experience, not textbook theory, and reflects realities seen in long-cycle, trust-driven project environments.
Why sales and marketing alignment keeps failing
Sales and marketing alignment is discussed endlessly.
Workshops are conducted. Processes are defined. CRMs are configured.
Yet on the ground, misalignment persists.
In my experience, the reason is simple:
alignment is treated as a process issue, when it is actually a leadership issue.
In project organisations, alignment is not about chasing more leads or improving conversion ratios. It is about how early customer signals are respected, interpreted, and acted upon.
What I’ve seen repeatedly in project organisations
In my experience, marketing teams are often closest to the pulse of the customer.
They speak to people on the ground at customer plants.
They hear early concerns, upcoming expansions, operational pain points, and informal intent—long before anything becomes a formal enquiry or RFQ.
These early signals are not “sales-ready leads”.
They are market intelligence.
What I have seen repeatedly, however, is that these early leads are often:
- Taken lightly by sales teams
- Deferred because they don’t look immediately actionable
- Labelled as “low quality” because they don’t convert quickly
This creates two damaging outcomes.
The hidden damage of ignoring early signals
1. Customer morale suffers
From the customer’s perspective, they shared information, showed intent, or opened a door—only to be met with delayed or inconsistent engagement.
Over time, this creates frustration and erodes trust.
2. Marketing teams lose momentum
Marketing teams feel their ground-level insights are being ignored. They continue generating leads, but morale drops because effort does not translate into meaningful action.
Sales, however, is not entirely wrong.
Why sales’ argument is also partly valid
Sales teams operate under constant pressure to deliver outcomes.
They will rightly argue:
“Not every lead converts into an order.”
In project-based businesses, this is absolutely true. Many early conversations never mature into contracts. Time and effort must be prioritised carefully.
The problem is not that sales filters leads.
The problem is how early signals are filtered or dismissed.
This is where alignment breaks down—not because either side is wrong, but because they optimise for different time horizons.
The long-term cost of misalignment
In project organisations, the cost of misalignment rarely appears immediately.
It shows up later as:
- Lost customer trust
- Missed opportunities for early influence
- Reduced chances of negotiated or repeat work
- Competitors entering conversations earlier
This is particularly damaging in environments where trust compounds into scope offloading.
Once trust is lost, it is extremely difficult to rebuild.
This pattern is similar to what happens in projects when early warning signs are ignored until they become crises—often driven by delayed decisions and analysis paralysis.
👉 https://projifi.blog/overcoming-analysis-paralysis-leadership/
What changed when alignment actually worked
I have also seen the opposite—and the difference is unmistakable.
In situations where sales and marketing were fully aligned very early, several things changed:
- Early leads were treated as signals to be nurtured, not immediately qualified or discarded
- Sales applied judgment instead of dismissal
- Marketing stayed involved beyond lead generation
- Customers experienced continuity instead of fragmented hand-offs
The result was not just a deal.
A large order was secured, followed by something more valuable:
- The client’s confidence increased
- Trust was established early
- Additional scope was offloaded over time
This did not happen because every lead was chased.
It happened because both teams respected early engagement and acted in sync.
Why alignment must be owned jointly at the top
In my experience, alignment works only when sales and marketing are anchored to a common leadership purpose.
When both functions operate independently, misalignment becomes inevitable.
Each optimises for its own metrics.
When there is a single leadership owner for sales and marketing together, moderation happens naturally:
- Sales discipline tempers marketing enthusiasm
- Marketing intelligence sharpens sales focus
- Early signals are debated constructively rather than ignored
This is not about hierarchy.
It is about shared accountability for customer trust.
Alignment is not about chasing every lead
A common misconception is that alignment means sales must act on every marketing lead.
That is neither realistic nor desirable in project organisations.
True alignment means:
- Differentiating lead maturity, not just lead volume
- Treating early signals as relationship investments
- Deciding together where to engage deeply and where to observe patiently
This requires leadership judgment—not automation.
While tools and platforms can support this process, even mainstream industry thinking acknowledges that shared understanding matters more than systems alone.
👉 https://www.salesforce.com/blog/sales-and-marketing-alignment/
What alignment looks like in practice
From experience, effective alignment in project-based organisations includes:
- Joint review of early leads
Not to qualify immediately, but to understand context and intent. - Shared ownership of customer conversations
Marketing does not disappear once sales engages. - Respect for market intelligence
Early insights are treated as signals, not noise. - Leadership moderation instead of escalation
Differences are resolved through judgment, not turf battles.
This mirrors how trust-based leadership outperforms supervision-heavy approaches in execution environments.
👉 https://projifi.blog/why-trust-really-beats-supervision-in-epc-projects/
Why this matters more in project organisations
In transactional businesses, misalignment can often be corrected quickly.
In project-based organisations:
- Sales cycles are long
- Trust precedes contracts
- Early engagement shapes outcomes
- Relationships matter more than campaigns
Ignoring early signals does not just lose a deal.
It can lose an entire future pipeline.
The real role of leadership in alignment
Sales and marketing alignment cannot be delegated to processes, dashboards, or tools.
It requires leadership to:
- Set a common purpose
- Reward collaboration over individual optimisation
- Protect long-term trust over short-term efficiency
When leadership avoids this responsibility, misalignment becomes structural.
Final thought
Sales and marketing alignment is not about internal harmony.
It is about external credibility.
Customers do not care about your org chart.
They care about whether you listen early, respond consistently, and act with intent.
When sales and marketing are aligned, trust compounds.
When they are not, noise compounds.
In project-based organisations, the difference shows up not in dashboards—but in who the customer trusts with the next scope of work.
Explore more practitioner insights
For more experience-led perspectives on leadership, execution, and decision-making in complex project environments, explore project leadership and execution insights on Projifi:
👉 https://projifi.blog/
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.